Archive for January, 2011

Group Genius

January 26, 2011

As I started pulling thoughts together for my Reading Apprenticeship blog debut, I began with the question, “Why blog?” I have had my own blog for several years and, while I have some faithful followers, the blog is really an opportunity for me to think out loud about different experiences, books, ideas, etc.

A book I am currently reading, Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration,* by Keith Sawyer, seems to have some interesting ideas for Reading Apprenticeship fans of the social dimension. See what you think:

“Collaboration is the secret to breakthrough creativity.” (p. ix)

“Doesn’t each creative spark come from one person? In fact, researchers have discovered that the mind itself is filled with a kind of internal collaboration, that even the insights that emerge when you’re completely alone can be traced back to previous collaborations.” (p. xii)

The author points out that achieving creativity, insight, and innovation is time intensive. Collaboration takes time, processing ideas takes time. For me, this parallels the Reading Apprenticeship professional development model, which nurtures collaboration and professional dialogue in every activity. New ideas are sparked, insight emerges, and these ideas and insights lead to a gradual shift in thinking—and new ideas and insights.

Perhaps the greatest lesson suggested is for us to dedicate protected time to the iterative process that inquiry and learning demand.

I am hopeful this blog will become a format to spark “group genius.” The intent is for readers to react, share, confirm, reframe, reinterpret, and enjoy this opportunity for collaboration.

Be generous in sharing your ideas, and use the commenting feature to provide that additional spark for us all to grow in our understanding and build a strong social dimension!

*Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books.

Kelly Pauling

Kelly Pauling

Blog Contributor Kelly Pauling

Kelly Pauling is Director of Curriculum Services at Colonial Intermediate Unit 20 (CIU20), and coordinates Reading Apprenticeship’s i3 grant in Pennsylvania. Previously she worked as a staff developer, curriculum specialist, and teacher of the deaf and hard of hearing. She first attended Reading Apprenticeship training in 2003 and was immediately captivated by the RA framework. She has worked diligently to build RA capacity throughout her area. Current passions, in addition to Reading Apprenticeship, include integrating technology in education, school improvement, and chocolate.

Planting the Seeds of Reading Apprenticeship, Part 2

January 19, 2011

In my previous post I explained why and how I model Reading Apprenticeship routines in colleagues’ community college classrooms. Our goal is to help their students become better readers of their class texts, but other benefits are apparent as well. Both teachers and students have had interesting things to say about this work.

Students have been quite frank about what is not working in their classes.

“If I don’t like to read or it is hard to read, merely assigning the reading does not teach the content.”

“Previously, I never saw the difference in some of the multiple-choice answers [on exams] because I did not understand the context and the vocabulary.”

“Sure, PowerPoints of the chapter are nice, but they do not help me with the reading. If I cannot read the chapter, the unit exam is impossible to pass with a high score. Teachers think that they have done their job when they create and show a PowerPoint of the chapter’s information. Really, it is not teaching us how to master the chapter’s topic. Instead, it is a teacher activity, not a student learning activity.”

On the other hand, faculty members appreciate having ways to address students’ and their own concerns. Foremost, they are pleased to see that the Reading Apprenticeship routines are student-centered and student-directed.

“My class is much happier doing than listening. That is a big lesson for me because before I did everything, and I assumed that I had their attention. Now I realize that the learning environment is so much more energized when students debate, ask for clarification from their peers, and think about the text.”

“These routines are not difficult; I am learning how to adapt them in so many ways and for so much content.”

“Seeing my class come alive and participate reassures me that learning is happening, just in a different way. The Reading Apprenticeship framework helps students understand the different resources they have to engage the text and derive specific meanings and information

Faculty also note that these student-centered routines make the lectures they do give more valuable. Having heard and seen what students are struggling with, teachers can hone their lectures to address particular content. The Reading Apprenticeship routines seem to be accomplishing three important things: students are more engaged, their retention and test scores are improving, and faculty have less preparation work.

In these two posts I have offered some suggestions for sharing Reading Apprenticeship in an often reluctant-to-change educational environment. I hope that others will also contribute  ideas for planting the seeds for Reading Apprenticeship on their campuses. Just click the “comment” link to add your thoughts below.

Planting the Seeds of Reading Apprenticeship, Part 1

January 14, 2011

Although many faculty at our community college have heard of Reading Apprenticeship or attended our campus-wide training sessions, their teaching loads offer little time to ponder the complexity of reading instruction. They tend to assume their students have the reading skills needed to succeed — until they see poor test results, students drop out, or students ask many “obvious” questions.

When faculty recognize that students need help with reading, they are concerned first that they don’t have training in teaching reading and second that their primary professional obligation is to cover the content of their classes.

For me as a faculty mentor and trainer, these are the exact reasons why Reading Apprenticeship is an important, appropriate, and effective instructional framework to use.  After all, as faculty members, we are the content “reading” experts. Who is better at revealing the secrets in the passages of our class texts?

When faculty ask me for assistance, I think it is critical to use actual coursework texts, so I request a desk copy of their primary text. I select several Reading Apprenticeship routines that fit the content and text and are likely matches for their teaching style, and then I schedule a visit to their classrooms.

I engage the students in a discussion about the value of reading in their course, introduce the four dimensions of the Reading Apprenticeship Framework, have the students do a personal reading history exercise, and then model a Reading Apprenticeship routine such as the Reading Strategies List or a Think Aloud about the organization of the text. Follow-up sessions have covered text features, the pairing of text passages and chapter graphics, vocabulary exercises, evidence/interpretation metacognitive logs, more Think Alouds, text annotation, and inquiry as a means for engaging the text.

In my next post I will share some of the feedback from students and faculty, including some interesting ideas about who benefits from student-centered classrooms.

Click here to read Part 2 of Planting the Seeds of Reading Apprenticeship.

Blog Contributor, Michele Lesmeister

Michele Lesmeister teaches Adult Education classes at Renton Technical College in Renton, Washington. She has a BA in Linguistics and a Master’s degree in Teaching English. Since 1990, she has focused on teaching adults transferable language skills in writing and reading and sometimes math for health sciences. She has published two texts with Pearson Education: Math Basics for the Health Care Professional, 3rd edition and Writing Basics for the Health Care Professional. Michele began her work with Reading Apprenticeship by attending the a 2008 Leadership Institute in Reading Apprenticeship. She is leading a college-wide initiative of institutionalizing Reading Apprenticeship under the Achieving the Dream grant for her institution. You can learn more about the work in Reading Apprenticeship at Renton Technical College at www.RTC-Rats.org.

Happy New Year, Happy New Blog!

January 6, 2011

As we all return from the holiday break into our regular lives—back to school, back to offices, choir rehearsal, sports practice—I am happy to welcome you to our “New” Reading Apprenticeship blog.

Many of you who are long-time colleagues read our blog when it started last January. After six months of posts, our creative and thoughtful colleague and blog-pioneer Gina Hale,  turned to other pressing work, and our blog took a vacation.

Now, in the new year, the Reading Apprenticeship blog is back with a group of regular contributors: Kelly Pauling, statewide coordinator of our i3 grant for Pennsylvania; Michele Lesmeister, Reading Apprenticeship coordinator and Adult Basic Education instructor at Renton Technical College, where their “RATs” Website keeps instructors across the curriculum in touch with new developments; Gina Hale, blogging from her new home state of South Dakota; and yours truly.

We invite any of you who would like to share observations, stories or questions from your work with Reading Apprenticeship to submit them to Jana Bouc, who will be coordinating our blog.

As I said in my first blog post, the stories I heard from teachers in Salt Lake City, Ann Arbor, and Indianapolis give me great hope for the power of person-to-person transformation; transformation that leads far beyond individual classrooms and individual lives. May we all find opportunities for those kinds of transformative exchanges in this coming year.


Blog contributor, Ruth Schoenbach

Ruth Schoenbach is Co-Director of the Strategic Literacy Initiative at WestEd. She taught and led reform initiatives in the San Francisco public schools in the 1980s and early 90s as an ESL teacher, curriculum developer, and professional development support provider in literacy. Since the mid-90s she and Cyndy Greenleaf have led the Strategic Literacy Initiative (SLI) at WestEd in developing the Reading Apprenticeship instructional framework and its parallel professional development model.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 67 other followers