Accomplished California Teachers Take on Professional Evaluation Issues


In the effort to rout ineffective teachers out of the system, teachers’ voices—even voices of some very good teachers—have been shouted down. Yet, what makes an effective teacher (one who can positively affect a student’s academic career) has neither been well-studied, described nor agreed upon, according to a number of studies cited in a new report by the Accomplished California Teachers, or ACT*.

More importantly, how do the good teachers become the best over the tenure of their careers?

At 41 pages, ACT’s report, supported by the National Board Resource Center at the Stanford School of Education and influenced by Linda Darling Hammond, is worth reading for anyone interested in improving teaching and learning in our schools. As the authors state in their introduction:

“We chose to begin here because we believe that without a common understanding of what constitutes teaching quality and how teachers should be evaluated, any further conversation about improving teaching will be inconsequential.”

The report makes concrete recommendations, based on “research, analysis of existing policies, input from academic experts, and our own experiences as promoters of quality teaching” in order to transform teacher evaluation into a tool that could “advance the quality of teaching across California.” (p iii)

Teachers and administrators will recognize many of the challenges and pitfalls identified in the current evaluation system under “what’s wrong with the current system?” including the lack of training and resources for administrators to support a cohesive and useful evaluation system, a focus on compliance rather than improvement, and a perfunctory approach that does nothing to improve instruction. (p 5)

One part of the solution proposed by ACT—a solution that could be put into place now by Professional Learning Communities— is to use the kind of formative assessments that  work for students in the teacher evaluation process. As they say in the report:

“Formative assessment in the hands of a skillful teacher not only helps the teacher keep track of student learning as it unfolds, but it also ensures that students are aware of the goals for their learning, know what constitutes evidence of mastery, and what they need to do to move forward. Unfortunately, few of us experience that kind of sophistication in assessments of our teaching. Teaching assessments are still top-down, superficial, and lacking meaningful feedback and recommendations for growth to the teacher. It is sadly ironic that the kinds of successful teaching practices that both teachers and researchers have identified as effective in promoting student learning are not similarly used to promote teacher learning.” (p 7)

Contrasting case studies (pages 34-35) offer helpful views of evaluation based on compliance versus evaluation processes that promote better teaching.

*Accomplished California Teachers (ACT) is a new teacher leadership network for the state of California funded by the Stuart Foundation and the Hewlett Foundation, and housed under the umbrella of the School of Education at Stanford University.

Visit ACTs blog.

Download the report from ACT

Anthony Cody is a founding member of ACT and an EdWeek blogger. Read Anthony Cody’s post about the report.

Tags: , , ,

3 Responses to “Accomplished California Teachers Take on Professional Evaluation Issues”

  1. Linda Darling-Hammond Says:

    It’s great to see the work of ACT highlighted in this blog. These accomplished teachers have truly walked the walk of great teaching in the classroom, and have much of importance to say about how teaching should be supported and evaluated. While I wrote the foreword to the report to call attention to the importance of listening to the voices of outstanding teachers, I did not influence its findings, as the blog seems to suggest. The ACT teachers led this process from start to finish, under the impressive leadership of National Board Certified teachers Sandy Dean, Anthony Cody, and David Cohen, and wrote the report from their research and experience. Their insights are well-grounded and invaluable. I hope the educational and policy communities are able to engage in a dialogue about how to put these ideas into more widespread practice.

    • Gina Hale Says:

      Thank you Linda for visiting our blog and leaving your comments! My choice of words, “influence,” probably did not convey the same appreciation that Anthony Cody’s “mentoring” did in his post. Your work has been such a welcome contribution to the field. I can only hope it influences many more of us. The work that these teachers have done in writing this report, founding ACT and managing the blog and other projects is inspiring. I am glad to share their work and hopefully spread the discussion a little further. Gina

  2. Cyndy Greenleaf Says:

    Thanks for clarifying, Linda. Just yesterday my colleague, Robert Linquanti, and I were talking about the lack of a career ladder for teachers that keeps them in the classroom (rather than leaving it for administration) but advances their professional stature and recognition as a skillful and influential teacher. This report and the work of ACT helps us imagine those professional roles.

Comments are closed.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers

%d bloggers like this: